Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 SO2D 1102 - Janiga v. State

Janiga v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2015

5 state decisions

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 575 So. 2d 181 - Jackson v. State · 522 So. 2d 802 - Jackson v. State · 593 So. 2d 1210 - Brown v. State · 561 So. 2d 617 - Carr v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that due process requires the state to prove every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt, and that a defendant has no obligation to present witnesses. Accordingly, the state cannot comment on a defendant’s failure to produce evidence to refute an element of a crime, because doing so could erroneously lead the jury to believe that the defendant carried the burden of introducing evidence. However, this court has applied a narrow exception to allow comment when the defendant voluntarily assumes some burden of proof by asserting the defenses of alibi, self-defense, and defense of others, relying on facts that could be elicited only from a witness who is not equally available to the state. A witness is not equally available when there is a special relationship between the defendant and the witness. (Footnotes and citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.