Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 SO2D 642 - State v. Pomeroy

State v. Pomeroy’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2015

11 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Boykin v. Alabama · Berkemer v. McCarty · Foy v. Northeast Suburban Life

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Whether there was probable cause to arrest prior to questioning; 2. Whether the statements and actions of the police indicate an intent to hold or restrain the accused; 3. Whether the accused reasonably believed he was restrained, and 4. The extent to which the investigation had focused on the accused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “this Court will not amend or set aside the illegally lenient sentence on its own motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.