Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 So. 2d 996 - State v. Raydo

713 So. 2d 996 - State v. Raydo’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 2017

19 state decisions

110199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rock v. Arkansas · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Luce v. United States · McGautha v. California · Brooks v. Tennessee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] specific statute covering a particular subject area always controls over a statute covering the same and other subjects in more general terms.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “under section 90.610(1) to include both a jury verdict of guilt and a plea of guilty, even though there had been no adjudication. See Johnson v. State, 449 So.2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) (guilty plea); Barber v. State, 413 So.2d 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) (jury verdict of guilt). To the contrary, in Parker, 563 So.2d at 1130 , the Fifth District rejected the reasoning of Johnson and Barber . It agreed with the reasoning of Justice Anstead (then Judge Anstead) in his concurring opinion in Roberts v. State, 450 So.2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “should be narrowly construed, but then found that the issue had not been preserved because the defendant did not testify. See Parker, 563 So.2d at 1131-32 . Although the First District in Raydo indicated its approval of Johnson and Barber , the correctness of those cases in broadly interpreting the term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.