Uhrig v. Pulliam’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1988
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hoyt v. Hoyt · Crenshaw v. Moore · McAdams v. McAdams · Duncan v. Duncan · Montesi v. Estate of Montesi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are of the opinion that only if the agreement purports to conclude all material rights and to effect a full settlement thereof under all contingencies would it have the effect of waiving the right to dissent or other rights of the surviving spouse. (Emphasis ours.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. Jeffers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.