Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 713 S.W.2d 766 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2014

13 state decisions

701986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Garza v. Alviar · BLC v. State · Meza v. State · In re I. B · In Re Q. D.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the alleged offense was against a person or against property, with weight in favor of transfer for offenses against a person; (2) whether the alleged offense was committed in an aggressive and premeditated manner; (3) whether a grand jury may be expected to return an indictment; (4) the sophistication and maturity of the child; (5) the record and previous history of the child; and (6) whether the procedures, services, and facilities currently available to the juvenile court are likely to adequately protect the public and rehabilitate the child.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In a discretionary transfer proceeding, there is no requirement of proof concerning procedures, services, and facilities available to the court for the juvenile’s rehabilitation because whatever resources are available would be within the courts knowledge without need of proof. 713 S.W.2d at 770 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.