Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 A.2d 416 - Commonwealth v. Torres

Commonwealth v. Torres’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Commonwealth v. Dugger · 318 Pa. Super. 240 - Commonwealth v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he mere fact that one or more of the anonymous sources provided a somewhat detailed account of the activities of the victims and their assailants preceding the murders does not, in and of itself, constitute a significant indicia of the reliability of that information. In addition, the fact that the police verified the address, phone number and general age given to them for Torres — whose address and phone number were listed in the phone book and were therefore freely available to the public — does not constitute a significant indicia of the reliability of the other information provided to the police by the anonymous sources.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.