Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 F.2d 1140 - Daw Industries, Inc. v. United States

Daw Industries, Inc. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

714 F.2d 1140 · 1983

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
November 2013
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Bausch Lomb Incorporated v. United States (1998), Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States (1988)

3 federal appellate ·

2601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1202 · 28 U.S.C. § 2639

Relies on Pullman-Standard v. Swint · United States v. New York Merchandise Co. · 340 F. Supp. 983 - Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United States · Schwarz v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether particular items fit the definition of prosthesis adopted above is a question of fact. Therefore, the trial court’s finding that the sheaths and socks are not prostheses will be reversed on appeal only if that finding is clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The first question we must address is whether the merchandise is a prosthesis, and our immediate task is to determine the meaning of prosthesis. This is a question of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the 'clearly erroneous' standard applies to all questions of fact”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.