United States v. McGee’s Empirical Analysis
714 F.2d 607 · 1983
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably United States of America, v. Microsoft Corporation, (2001), United States v. Miami University (2002)
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Darby · Gomillion v. Lightfoot · Illinois State Board of Elections v. Socialist Workers Party · Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh · Hope v. Commissioner
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[T]he authority of state laws or their administration may not interfere with the carrying out of a national purpose. Where enforcement of the state law would handicap efforts to carry out the plans of the United States, the state enactment must, of course, give way.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]n evidentiary hearing is typically required before an injunction may be granted, but a hearing is not necessary where no triable issues of fact are involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Schmitt v. Husted“Normally, an evidentiary hearing is required before an injunction may be granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.