United States v. Peed’s Empirical Analysis
714 F.2d 7 · 1983
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2018
7 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Meadows
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There was no civil suit pending at the time this conversation took place. [The defendant's] jargon ("drop the charges") implies concern over criminal prosecution. These were not negotiations aimed at settling a civil claim, negotiations that the policy behind Rule 408 seeks to encourage. Nor were [the defendant's] statements followed up by any attempt on [the defendant's] part to obtain money or resources for achieving a settlement with [the complainant]. [ 36 ]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an offer to compromise a civil claim, which under Fed.R.Evid. 408 cannot be introduced [in the criminal proceeding before it] as evidence of liability”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“rise to the dignity of an offer to compromise a civil claim for purposes of [Rule] 408.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.