United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
714 F.2d 809 · 1983
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990)
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Amperex Electronic Corp. v. New York Racing Assn., Inc. · Williams v. United States · United States v. Richmond Engineering, Inc. · United States v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the jury verdict,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.