Al-Marri v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
714 F.3d 1183 · 2013
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (§ 303 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3144 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Christensen v. Harris County · United States v. Wilson · Hamdi v. Rumsfeld · Barber v. Thomas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as a result of the offense for which the sentence was imposed” because it was based on independent authority to detain defendant as a witness or enemy combatant). 8 .In applying its rule, the majority appears to limit its reach such that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zavala v. Ives
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.