Richmond v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
714 F.3d 725 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 911 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324A (§ 274a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. · Yun-Zui Guan v. Gonzales · Lecaj v. Holder · Rodriguez v. Gonzales · Sepulveda v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The negative pregnant of this exception is clear: for aliens ... who fail to meet those requirements, false citizenship claims need not be knowing to run afoul of [the statute].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“read so broadly that it fails to exclude anything.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.