Toy v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
714 F.3d 881 · 2013
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Department of the Navy v. Egan · Vanderbrook v. Unitrin Preferred Insurance · Bustos v. Martini Club, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the occupancy of such position, or access to the premises in or upon which any part of the duties of such position is performed or is to be performed, is subject to any requirement imposed in the interest of the national security of the United States under any security program in effect pursuant to or administered under any statute of the United States or any Executive order of the President; and (2) such individual has not fulfilled or has ceased to fulfill that requirement.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an impermissible intrusion by the Judicial Branch into the authority of the Executive Branch over matters of national security.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.