714 F. Supp. 1126 - Jackson v. Johns’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2002
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1927 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bishop v. Wood · Dickeson v. Quarberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whether the plaintiff had a constitutionally protected property right in his employment depends on whether state law, or some other independent source, provided him with an expectation of continued employment. Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 [ 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 ] (1972); Bishop v. Wood, 426 U.S. 341 [ 96 S.Ct. 2074 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 ] (1976). An expectation of continued employment also may arise through implied agreements or administrative regulations. DeBono v. Vizas, 427 F.Supp. 905 (D.Colo.1977).” At 1129.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the Board of County Commissioners of a non-home rule county cannot, by language in a personnel manual, supersede the sheriff's statutory authority to hire and fire `at his pleasure.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.