Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 P2D 1231 - Bosler v. Shuck

Bosler v. Shuck’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2017

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 7 Cal. 3d 94 - Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn. · 4 Ill. App. 3d 962 - Holiday Magic, Inc. v. Scott · Dean v. . Kochendorfer · 272 Pa. Super. 271 - Triester v. 191 Tenants Ass'n · Farmers Gin Company v. Ward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`To show that regularly issued process was perverted to the accomplishment of an improper purpose is enough.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]here is no evidence of any affirmative act manifesting a perversion in the process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Restatement (Second) of Torts § 682, p. 474 (1977).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.