Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 P2D 217 - Brooks v. State

Brooks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2023

4 state decisions

2019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spuehler v. State · Nunley v. State · Langdell v. State · Gentry v. State · Fields v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he State is not required to prove that an accused had actual knowledge that the property was stolen; it is sufficient to prove that the accused had reasonable cause to believe the property was stolen.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “supplemented with other facts inconsistent with honest possession, creates a question of fact for the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.