State v. Brickey’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Paffel v. Paffel (1986), State v. Redd (1999)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Alabama · Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles · Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. City of Dallas · United States v. Joseph A. Chase, United States of America v. Robert H. Parrish, United States of America v. Wyatt J. Roy, Jr. · United States v. Levy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[DJue process considerations prohibit a prosecutor from refiling criminal charges earkher dismissed for insufficient evidence unless the prosecutor can show that new or previously unavailable evidence has surfaced or that other good cause justifies refiling.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morgan · State v. Houston“[Dlismissal and discharge do not preclude the state from instituting a subsequent prosecution for the same offense.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jaeger · State v. Dykes“[When a charge is refiled, the prosecutor must, whenever possible, refile the charges before the same magistrate who does not consider the matter de novo, but looks at the facts to determine whether the new evidence or changed circumstances are sufficient to require a re-examination and possible reversal of the earlier decision dismissing the charges.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dykes · State v. Morgan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.