Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 SO2D 1263 - Fine v. Senette

Fine v. Senette’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 681 So. 2d 944 - Knapper v. Connick · 917 F. Supp. 919 - Quartararo v. Catterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the requisite communications between the prosecutor and clemency authorities, as a portion of the sentencing process, are within the scope of the prosecutor's role as an advocate for the state and are entitled to absolute immunity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.