King v. Cutter Laboratories’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 26 Cal. 3d 588 - Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories · 247 So. 2d 40 - Gates v. Foley · 451 So. 2d 447 - Insurance Co. of North America v. Pasakarnis · 471 So. 2d 533 - Celotex Corp. v. Copeland · Conley v. Boyle Drug Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`modernize traditional principals of tort law ... as society and technology change,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.