Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 So. 2d 440 - White v. State

714 So. 2d 440 - White v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably 991 So. 2d 803 - Kasischke v. State (2008), 823 So. 2d 757 - Hall v. State (2002)

1 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

590199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Trotter v. State · 573 So. 2d 813 - Lareau v. State · 691 So. 2d 1068 - Lawrence v. State · Galloway v. State · Gonzalez v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “one touchstone of the collective legislative will”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The Fourth District placed particular importance on the language of rule 3.702(d)(12) that expressly provided assessment of eighteen points when a defendant was convicted of a felony “while having in his or her possession a firearm.” In other words, the court construed the “while” language to mean that the firearm possession must occur during the commission of a separate crime that does not itself necessarily involve possession of firearm as a legal element thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]here the possession of a firearm itself is already specifically targeted by the legislature for punishment as an offense, the firearm possession incidental to that offense would not constitute a separate and additional factor to the underlying offense, so as to trigger an additional enhancement for the firearm possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.