Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 So. 2d 524 - Wilkinson v. Wilkinson

714 So. 2d 524 - Wilkinson v. Wilkinson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2012

5 state decisions

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · Vick v. Vick · 625 So. 2d 856 - Schiller v. Schiller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “after considering the financial resources of both parties, order a party to pay a reasonable amount for attorney's fees....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he trial court concluded that the wife was entitled to receive an award of attorney's fees because the husband asserted "unreasonable positions" regarding the equitable distribution of the parties' marital assets. However, the record does not indicate that the husband intended to "frustrate or stall" the dissolution proceedings. See Rosen, 696 So.2d at 700 . In that regard, the husband did not request any continuances nor did he violate any rules of discovery. Moreover, the parties' pretrial negotiations resulted in only a $10,000 difference with regard to equitable distribution. There is no evidence in the record which indicates that the husband's claims were designed to harass the wife. See id. Thus, it does not appear that the husband acted unreasonably during these dissolution proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.