Hernandez v. Amisub, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · 599 So. 2d 694 - Ocean Bank of Miami v. Inv-Uni Inv. Corp. · Times Publishing Co. v. Huffstetler · 679 So. 2d 1286 - Mangoni v. Temkin · 659 So. 2d 1316 - Hernandez v. AMISUB (AMERICAN HOSP.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not necessarily infer intent or deliberation. Indeed, given the facts here, it is quite unlikelyeven unthinkablethat anyone would intentionally or deliberately”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[b]ecause [the plaintiff] produced sufficient evidence to show that the Hospital concealed evidence or intentionally misrepresented facts, [the plaintiff] was brought within the extended seven-year statutory period of repose in section 95.11(4)(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“within 2 years from the time the incident giving rise to the action occurred or within 2 years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.