Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 SO2D 570 - Bozeman v. State

Bozeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Barton Protective Services, Inc. v. Faber (1999), McMillan v. State (2012)

25 state decisions

170199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Berkery v. Commissioner · Davis v. Oklahoma · 639 So. 2d 972 - Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General re Funding for Criminal Justice · 589 So. 2d 287 - State v. Cabrera · In re Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851 (Collateral Relief after Death Sentence has been Imposed) & Rule 3.850 (Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) that the defendant reasonably believed that his action was necessary to avoid an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to himself or others, (2) that the defendant did not intentionally or recklessly place himself in a situation in which it would be probable that he would be forced to choose the criminal conduct, (3) that there existed no other adequate means to avoid the threatened harm except the criminal conduct, (4) that the harm sought to be avoided was more egregious than the criminal conduct perpetrated to avoid it, and (5) that the defendant ceased the criminal conduct as soon as the necessity or apparent necessity for it ended.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"a defendant is entitled to have his jury instructed on the law applicable to his theory of defense if there is any evidence presented supporting such a theory, even if the only evidence supporting the defense theory comes from the defendant's own testimony." [c.o.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A trial court's decision on the giving or withholding of a proposed jury instruction is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard of review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.