State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably 945 So. 2d 277 - State v. Shumaker (2006), 768 So. 2d 542 - State v. Hoffman (2000)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Tibbs v. Florida · Angrist v. United States · ITT Gilfillan v. Clayton · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the defendant is convicted of two or more offenses based on the same act or transaction, or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, the terms of imprisonment shall be served concurrently unless the court expressly directs that some or all be served consecutively. Other sentences of imprisonment shall be served consecutively unless the court expressly directs that some or all of them be served concurrently. In the case of the concurrent sentence, the judge shall specify, and the court minutes shall reflect, the date from which the sentences are to run consecutively. (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rollins“rule is to be applied sensibly and with reason. Id. at 95. The original writing is required to prove the contents of the writing, unless otherwise provided. La. C.E. art. 1002. According to La. C.E. art. 1003,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless . . . [a] genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.