Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 714 SW2D 241 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2016 · most notably James David Carter v. Ricky Bell, Warden Paul Summers, Attorney General (2000), State v. Bland (1997)

3 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

2601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · State v. Goodman · Carroll v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the line between harmless and prejudicial error is in direct proportion to the degree of the margin by which the proof exceeds the standard required to convict beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This demonstrates that the jury had clearly in mind the elements necessary to convict of the crime of the felony of robbery and quite properly declined to include it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the procedure did not give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification and that under the totality of the circumstances, the in-court identification was reliable and independent of any previous suspect identification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.