McKibbon v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1990
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 175th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Britt v. North Carolina · Passmore v. State · Billie v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The defendant should set out with specificity that portion of the testimony he desires from any prior proceeding, whether from his own trial or that of a third party, and demonstrate a particular need for a transcription of that evidence. Much weight should be given to the trial judge's exercise of discretion after conducting a hearing on the particular request."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKibbon v. State““Rather than extend and broaden the Billie rule as requested by the defendant, we feel that each request should be treated on a case by case basis.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKibbon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.