Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 715 A2D 1156 - Commonwealth v. Laudenberger

Commonwealth v. Laudenberger’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2018

6 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Commonwealth v. Chester · Commonwealth v. LaCava · Commonwealth v. Jackson · Commonwealth v. Chambers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Public policy, the fundamental principles of fairness and the due process of law require the admission of declarations against penal interest where it can be determined that those statements: (1) exculpate the defendant from the crime for which he is charged; (2) are inherently trustworthy in that they are written or orally made to reliable persons of authority or those having [an] adverse interest to the declarant; and that they are made pre-trial or during the trial itself. Under these circumstances, an exception to the hearsay rule, in our view, is mandatory. The protection of innocent defendants must override any technical adherence to a policy that excludes evidence on the ground of hearsay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An abuse of discretion is not merely an error of judgment, but if in reaching a conclusion the law is overridden or misapplied ... discretion is abused.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.