Terry v. Duckworth’s Empirical Analysis
715 F.2d 1217 · 1983
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 1988
most recently cited
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Townsend v. Sain · United States v. Marion · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The [Arizona] state court was in fundamental error in its reading of Barker v. Wingo and in the standard applied in judging petitioner’s speedy trial claim. Barker v. Wingo expressly rejected the notion that an affirmative demonstration of prejudice was necessary to probe a denial of the constitutional right to a speedy trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a] deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper the defense should be weighted heavily against the government. A more neutral reason such as negligence ... should be weighted less heavily.... Finally, a valid reason, such as a missing witness, should serve to justify appropriate delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.