Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 715 F.2d 1228 - United States v. Cannon

United States v. Cannon’s Empirical Analysis

715 F.2d 1228 · 1983

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably United States v. Harris (1985), United States v. Salerno (1989)

24 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

2201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Massiah v. United States · Abney v. United States · Miller v. United States · United States v. West · United States v. Dunbar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “appeal from the denial of a frivolous [Abney -type] motion does not divest the district court of jurisdiction to proceed with trial, if the district court has found the motion to be frivolous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.