Starnes v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
715 F.2d 134 · 1983
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Ganem v. Heckler (1984), Burnett v. Bowen (1987)
22 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Califano v. Sanders · Weinberger v. Salfi · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Califano v. Yamasaki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The findings and decisions of the Secretary after a hearing shall be binding upon all individuals who were parties to such hearing. No findings of fact or decision of the Secretary shall be reversed by any person, tribunal, or governmental agency except as herein provided. No action against the United States, the Secretary, or any officer or employee thereof shall be brought under section 1331 or 1346 of title 28 to recover on any claim arising under this subchapter.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[M]andamus jurisdiction [is] unavailable to those plaintiffs who fail[ ] to exhaust administrative remedies, absent a showing that the Secretary frustrated exhaustion by failing to act on the plaintiff's administrative claims”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“shall also apply with respect to this subchapter to the same extent as ... applicable with respect to subchapter II ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.