Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 715 F.2d 1476 - F. Alderete General Contractors, Inc. v. United States

F. Alderete General Contractors, Inc. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

715 F.2d 1476 · 1983

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
3
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp. (1991), Atari, Inc. v. JS & A Group, Inc. (1984)

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

2401983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 1631

Relies on St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Rosado v. Wyman · Jones v. Securities & Exchange Commission · M. Steinthal & Co. v. Seamans · United States v. John C. Grimberg Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] long standing rule in the Federal Courts that jurisdiction is determined at the time the suit is filed and after vesting, cannot be ousted by subsequent events, including action by the parties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “should be read in the light of the court’s central holding and the controlling fact in that case,” F. Alderete Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 1476, 1479 (Fed.Cir.1983), and”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We are aware of the advantage which an appellate court has in resolving an issue where the ground has been well plowed in the conflicting decisions of a lower court.”). . Although such”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.