Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 715 F.2d 843 - United States v. Gomberg

United States v. Gomberg’s Empirical Analysis

715 F.2d 843 · 1983

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
October 2014
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably United States v. Young (1984), United States v. Xavier (1993)

49 federal appellate · 7 district ·

3901983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Missouri v. Hunter · Zant v. Stephens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Duplicity is the joining of two or more distinct offenses in a single count, so that a general verdict does not reveal exactly which crimes the jury found the defendant had committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Block-burger test always deems a lesser included offense the same as the greater because by definition the greater offense includes all the elements of the lesser.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “agreed to participate in an unlawful scheme with knowledge of its essential nature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.