Boykins v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis
715 F.2d 995 · 1983
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
July 1999
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Castaneda v. Partida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the difference between the expected value and the observed number is greater than two or three standard deviations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McGinnis v. Johnson“[e]mploying the statistical analysis approved by the Supreme Court in Castaneda”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McGinnis v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.