United States v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
715 F.3d 1069 · 2013
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Katz v. United States · Crawford v. Washington · Davis v. Washington · Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · California v. Acevedo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ommercial GPS units are widely available, and most modern cell phones have GPS tracking capabilities. Courts routinely rely on GPS technology to supervise individuals on probation or supervised release, and, in assessing the Fourth Amendment constraints associated with GPS tracking, courts generally have assumed the technology's accuracy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'merely [a] computer printout[] of information generated by accepted technology.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Lawson · State v. Lawson“created . . . for the purpose of establishing or proving some fact at trial”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Lawson · State v. Lawson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.