Petersen v. Boeing Co.’s Empirical Analysis
715 F.3d 276 · 2013
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Relies on M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute · Moss v. U.S. Secret Service · Manetti-Farrow, Inc. v. Gucci America, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) 'if the inclusion in the agreement was the product of fraud or overreaching'; (2) 'if the party wishing to repudiate the clause would effectively be deprived of his day in court were the clause enforced'; and (3) 'if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the context of a Rule 12(b)(3) motion based upon a forum selection clause, the trial court must draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party and resolve all factual conflicts in favor of the non-moving party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“provided specific evidence sufficient to demonstrate that he would be wholly foreclosed from litigating his claims against [defendants] in a Saudi forum,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.