DeLong v. Dickhaut’s Empirical Analysis
715 F.3d 382 · 2013
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1746 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Rose v. Lundy · Smith v. Barry · Rhines v. Weber · Neverson v. Farquharson · Clements v. Maloney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it would likely be an abuse of discretion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.