Nack v. Walburg’s Empirical Analysis
715 F.3d 680 · 2013
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2342 · 47 U.S.C. § 227 · 47 U.S.C. § 402 · 47 U.S.C. § 405
Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Alexander v. Sandoval · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. · New York Telephone Company v. New York State Department of Labor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he court of appeals [has] exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of [agency] orders.” (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2342 )). To seek judicial review, the aggrieved individual must”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is questionable whether the regulation at issue [ ] properly could have been promulgated under the statutory section that authorizes a private cause of action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“), prohibits the use of any device to send, to a telephone facsimile machine, an”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.