Aviles v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Martin v. Secretary of Department of Health, Education & Welfare · Havas v. Bowen · 702 F. Supp. 47 - Burnette v. Bowen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Juvenile diabetes mellitus ... requiring parenteral [injected] insulin. And one of the following, despite prescribed therapy: A. Recent, recurrent hospitalizations with acidosis; or B. Recent, recurrent episodes of hypoglycemia; or C. Growth retardation ...; or D. Impaired renal function ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.