Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 715 NE2D 1 - Cahoon v. Cummings

Cahoon v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jones v. Montefiore Hospital · Scafidi v. Seiler · Olympia Hotels Corp. v. Johnson Wax Development Corp. · Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc. · Perez v. Las Vegas Medical Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One who undertakes, gratuitously or for consideration, to render services which he should recognize as necessary for the protection of the other’s person or things, is subject to liability to the other for physical harm resulting from his failure to exercise reasonable care to perform his undertaking, if (a) his failure to exercise such care increases the risk of harm...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When the death of one is caused by the wrongful act or omission of another, the personal representative of the former may maintain an action therefor against the latter, if the former might have maintained an action had he or she ... lived, against the latter for an injury for the same act or omission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We do not agree that the fact that the supreme court did not describe a method for calculation of damages means that the supreme court intended to adopt a calculation method such as the one set out in McKellips . We think it more likely that the supreme court intended to allow for full recovery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.