Oswald v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Rodriquez v. State (1987), Yearty v. State (1991)
1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Easton v. United States · State v. Andrews · Tookak v. State · Barry v. State · 18 Wash. App. 213 - State v. Cosden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Count I [digital penetration] encompassed foreplay leading to the act of sexual intercourse charged in Count II, and consequently could not support a separate conviction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“there was a sufficient break in time and circumstance to warrant separate convictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.