Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 715 P2D 74 - Eddy v. Brown

Eddy v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
7
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Miller v. Miller (1998), Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. (1992)

29 federal appellate · 1 district · 33 state decisions

5501986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. Jones · Hall v. May Department Stores Co. · Breeden v. League Services Corp. · McCormack v. Oklahoma Publishing Co. · Wells v. Thomas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “utterly intolerable in a civilized community.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “One who by extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress to another is subject to liability for such emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other results from it, for such bodily harm.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Conduct which, though unreasonable, is neither ‘beyond all possible bounds of decency’ in the setting in which it occurred, nor is one that can be ‘regarded as utterly intolerable in a civilized com munity/ falls short of having actionable quality.” 715 P.2d at 77 .”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.