Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

715 So. 2d 1155

Silverman v. Silverman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 26, 1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-08-26

Relies on 689 So. 2d 378 - Roberts v. Roberts

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-08-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2013

6 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We reverse the final judgment of dissolution awarding the former wife a property interest in the pending contingency fee matters of the former husband’s law practice. See Roberts v. Roberts, 689 So.2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). On remand, the trial court may reconsider the alimony award in terms of the likelihood of recovery of fees in considering the former husband’s income and present standard of living, or the court may reserve the right to consider the fees in a future modification, as they have not yet been considered and bear on the former husband’s ability to pay. See id. at 382.

STONE, C.J., and FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.
/715/so2d/1155 · .json · Public domain