State v. Foreman’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 686 So. 2d 204 - Ex Parte Gonzalez · Ellis v. Pope · 659 So. 2d 113 - Ex Parte Chrysler Corp. · 584 So. 2d 503 - Tubbs v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The act creating two divisions in St. Clair County, Act No. 53, Acts of Alabama 1907, does not violate Art. I, § 6, Alabama Constitution of 1901, and prospective jurors for each division can properly be called from the county at large.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"That in all criminal prosecutions, the accused has a right to ... a speedy, public trial, by an impartial jury of the county or district in which the offense was committed ...."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.