Guilford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 1998

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1998-08-14

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2005

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court, concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA.”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Guilford v. State

Relies on 697 So. 2d 504 - Amendments to Rules of Judicial Administration · 689 So. 2d 336 - O'BRIEN v. State · Rooney v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1998-08-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1PER CURIAM.

¶2We affirm the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s most recent post-conviction motion. This is the defendant’s fourth post-conviction motion and sixth appeal or petition to this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case , No. 91-6837-CFA. Enough is enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. As this court did in Hendrix v. State, 712 So.2d 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rooney v. State, 699 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) and O’Brien v. State, 689 So.2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So.2d 511 (Fla.1997), the defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting.

¶3AFFIRMED. '

COBB, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.