Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 715 SO2D 950 - Fisher v. State

Fisher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 493 So. 2d 1019 - Wilson v. State · 547 So. 2d 928 - Cochran v. State · 696 So. 2d 738 - Coolen v. State · Hoefert v. State · 715 So. 2d 944 - Cummings v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Premeditation is more than a mere intent to kill; it is a fully formed purpose to kill. [Citation omitted.] Premeditation may be proved by circumstantial evidence. [Citation omitted.] However, premeditation sought to be proved by circumstantial evidence must be inconsistent with every other reasonable inference. [Citation omitted.] If the State’s proof fails to exclude a reasonable hypothesis that die homicide occurred odier than by premeditated design, a verdict of first-degree murder cannot be sustained.” 715 So. 2d at 952 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.