Moore v. Balkcom’s Empirical Analysis
716 F.2d 1511 · 1983
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2013 · most notably Leatherwood v. Mississippi (1984), Daniel Loconte v. Richard Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth (1988)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Foman v. Davis · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia · Lockett v. Ohio · Eddings v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to see if the state court's findings of fact, their conclusion based on a review of similar cases, was supported by the”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“individualized sentencing and objective standards.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The district court found that petitioner had been represented by counsel at all times. Counsel explicitly referred to this issue in the original habeas petition filed approximately two years before the proposed amendment. We cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in denying the proposed amendment in this case where counsel apparently considered and rejected the proposed arguments two years before filing the proposed amendment. 16”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Moore v. Kemp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.