In Re Cornelius Mulder and Henricus Elisabeth Jozef Wulms’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2016
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Application of Hans Hilmer, Gerhard Korger, Rudi Weyer and Walter Aumuller · Application of Guido H. Stempel, Jr · In re Clarke · In re Ziegler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[P]rinted publication ... is prior art under [section] 102(a), ..., and thus also 'prior art' under [section] 103.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.