Howze v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
716 F.2d 396 · 1983
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
December 1986
most recently cited
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Patterson v. New York · Rideout v. United States · Leland v. Oregon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'so long as a jury is instructed that the state has the burden of proving every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, there is no due process violation' if the state places the affirmative defense of insanity upon the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is obvious that one may commit a purposeful act not knowing it to be wrong, or commit such a purposeful act, even though the actor knows the act to be wrong, but lacks the ability to refrain from doing it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wood v. Rc Marshall“state courts are the ultimate expositors of state law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.