Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 F.2d 40 - Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Simmons v. Interstate Commerce Commission’s Empirical Analysis

716 F.2d 40 · 1983

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Harris v. Amoco Production Co. (1985), Buckley v. Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board (1993)

49 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

34019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1848 (§ 9 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956) · 15 U.S.C. § 717R · 28 U.S.C. § 2344 · 28 U.S.C. § 2348 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 702

Relies on Chicago Junction Case · United States Upon the Relation and for the Use and Benefit of Texas Portland Cement Company v. D C McCord · Pacific Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Power Commission, General Motors Corporation, Intervenors. Mississippi Power and Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, General Motors Corporation, Intervenors · 389 U.S. 486 · Interstate Commerce Commission v. Diffenbaugh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny party aggrieved by the final order ...”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “would enable a late-filing party ... to perfect an appeal beyond the 60-day period which the statute prescribes.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To give meaning to that apparently intentional variation, we must read”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.