Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 716 F.2d 646 - Parks v. Watson

Parks v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

716 F.2d 646 · 1983

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

77 federal appellate · 7 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably Nollan v. California Coastal Commission (1987), Dolan v. City of Tigard (1994)

77 federal appellate · 7 district · 12 state decisions

75019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 15 (§ 4 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Perry v. Sindermann · Bishop v. Wood · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The background and experience of plaintiff in his prospective business 2. Affirmative action on the part of plaintiff to engage in the proposed business ... 3. The ability of plaintiff to finance the business and the purchase of equipment and facilities necessary to engage in the business ... 4. The consumation of contracts by plaintiff ...””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'threatened loss or injury cognizable in equity proximately resulting from the alleged antitrust violation,'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[o]nce the conditions [were] met the city lack[ed] discretionary powers.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.